Meta Ads

Skincare Brand Meta Ads: ROAS From 2.2x to 4.8x in 75 Days

Meta account audit and full funnel rebuild

DTC Skincare Brand Skincare & Beauty 75 days
Skincare Brand Meta Ads: ROAS From 2.2x to 4.8x in 75 Days case study 4.8x ROASROAS
4.8x ROAS
Headline result
2.2x to 4.8x
ROAS
$36 to $20
Cost per acquisition
$31.5K to $156.8K
Monthly revenue
01

The challenge

  • The account was running but not performing. Cost per acquisition was high, ROAS moved around with no clear reason, and there was no funnel logic behind the campaigns.
  • Prospecting, retargeting and retention were all live at once and competing for the same budget. Tracking was incomplete, so decisions were being made on numbers that were not the real numbers.
02

What we did

  • A full audit first: campaign structure, attribution settings, creative performance and the gaps between funnel stages.
  • Then the rebuild. Each campaign got one job (prospecting, view content, add to cart, initiate checkout, purchase and retention) with its own budget, instead of overlapping audiences bidding against each other.
  • The Conversions API was implemented so purchase data returning to Meta was accurate, which is what lets the algorithm optimise properly. Creative testing was scaled onto the winning ads rather than spread thin.
03

The outcome

In 75 days ROAS went from 2.2x to 4.8x, cost per acquisition dropped from $36 to $20, and monthly revenue grew from $31,500 to $156,800.

04

Project notes

What it means. Revenue grew roughly 5x while cost per acquisition fell by 44%. Those two usually move in opposite directions. The account was not underfunded, it was badly structured, and the audit found that before a dollar of extra budget went in.

More Work

Other projects with numbers behind them

Want results like this?

Send your site and a specialist will reply in writing within 48 hours with what we would do first, and what it is worth.

Get My Free Proposal